One of the most effective ways of communicating permissions to potential reusers of data are licences. | DCC,2014
The clear indication of rights for reuse is an important condition to comply with the R (Reusable) in FAIR data management. A licence agreement is a lawful instrument that determines in advance what users and computers are allowed to do with (meta)data, software, code and databases. This section discusses possible licences.
Creative Commons licences for data
The clear - and machine-readable - indication of rights for reuse is an important condition to comply with the R (Reusable) in FAIR data management. With Creative Commons licences (2017) this is possible. The main features of using Creative Commons licences for licensing data, datasets and databases are:
- The ease of use of the licences;
- The wide dissemination and high awareness of the licences;
- Their availability in both machine-readable forms as well as in a form that can be read by humans. In this way, both researchers and computers know immediately what they are allowed to do with the data;
The above characteristics increase the likelihood that licensed data or software will actually be reused. In order to make reuse of datasets and software as probable as possible, it makes sense to choose a licence within the CC licences that:
- Makes the research data available to as wide an audience as possible;
- Enables the widest possible use.
The holder of a database can use a Creative Commons licence to allow use that could cause problems under database law.
CC0 for the R in FAIR
The CC0 Public Domain Dedication licence (Creative Commons, n.d.a.) has been specially designed to remove legal and technical obstacles to the reuse of research data. A blog by Dryad (2011) explains in detail why CC0 is essential if you want to facilitate data reuse. What the message of this blogpost comes down to is that you can make reuse difficult or even impossible if reusers want to combine different datasets and the licences don't match.
Creative Commons has collected a list of examples of organisations that use CC0 (Creative Commons, n.d.b.).
Licences for software and code
Creative Commons licences aren't suitable for software. Other licences exist for this purpose, (GitHub, n.d.) such as:
- MIT License (Open Source Initiative, n.d.a.);
- Apache Licence 2 (Open Source Initiative, n.d.b.);
- GNU General Public Licence 3 (GNU, n.d.).
Click to open/close
4TU.Centre for Research Data (n.d.). Licensing. https://researchdata.4tu.nl/en/use-4turesearchdata/archive-research-data/upload-your-data-in-our-data-archive/licencing/
DANS (n.d.). DANS EASY. https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/ui/home
DANS (2016). DANS license agreement. https://dans.knaw.nl/en/about/organisation-and-policy/legal-information/DANSlicenceagreementUK5.3DEF.pdf
DCC (2014). How to License Research Data. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/reports/guides/How_To_License_Research_Data.pdf
Creative Commons (2017). Creative Commons licenties. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
Creative Commons (n.d.a.). CC0 - "No rights reserverd". https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0
Creative Commons (n.d.b.). CC0 use for data. https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0
Github (n.d.). Choose a license. https://choosealicense.com/
GNU (n.d.). GNU general public license. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html
License Selector (n.d.). http://ufal.github.io/public-license-selector/
Open Source Initiative (n.d.a.). The MIT license. https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
Open Source Initiative (n.d.b.). Apache License, version 2.0. https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT